In today’s world, (world as in America) in order to run for
elected office, the candidate needs lots of money. In other countries the election season last a
few weeks, here, for the Presidency it is more than 2 years.
For the House of Representatives, since there are elections
every 2 years, the campaigning never stops.
And so, for Presidential candidates, money and lots of it is
as necessary to their campaigns as oxygen is to humans.
Hillary Clinton, in today’s disclosure, has about $33 million
in cash on hand. In hand, not pledged. She spent almost $26 million in the 3rd
fundraising quarter of this year.
Senator Sanders has about $27 mil on hand and could catch
Hillary with his small donations.
Marco Rubio raised less than $6 million, while Jeb Bush
raised $13 million.
Ben Carson hauled in $20 million, Ted Cruz $12 and Carly
Fiorina about $7.
(I hope when this campaign is over that Fiorina pays off her
bills before the 2024 election cycle begins.) Rand Paul raised less than $2.5
mil. Ouch.
Look for Martin O’Malley to exit soon. He raised about $1.2
million and has less than $1 million on hand. That would be a lot of money if
he were in another country.
And then there is The Donald, “I
don’t need anybody’s money. I’m using my own money. I’m not using the
lobbyists. I’m not using donors. I don’t care. I’m really rich.” He told
us loudly in June when he announced his
presidential bid.
He received just under $4 million in small-unsolicited
donations from 74,000 donors. He kept it of course.
So, what exactly are these people buying with all of this
money? Who profits?
I guess they are pumping money into the economy, but from my
perspective a bloody waste of time and money.
However, the only candidates at this point that have
benefited from all of that money being spent are Clinton, The Donald, Carson
and Sanders.
The rest of them are just looking.
In the DC arena, Mitch McConnell pledged that there would be
no government shutdown. (That attitude makes sense after the 2013 debacle for
which the GOP was blamed and with a Presidential election next year).
In August he said “Let me say it again, no more government
shutdowns,” adding “we will find a way through negotiations.”
“We have divided government. The different parties control
the Congress, control the White House, and at some point we’ll negotiate the
way forward,” he said.
Well either he has developed amnesia or the sources in DC
have gotten it wrong.
Treasury has moved the date by which the debt limit has to
be raised to 11/3 and in the same news cycle we learn that the Leader of the
Senate is going back on his word. (There is nothing new there, but one does
live in hope).
McConnell has apparently changed his mind and is willing to
risk a shutdown. He reportedly wants to reduce the COLA, (no COLA expected next
year, by the way) increase the retirement age and limit Medicare benefits for
the rich, which for the President and the Dems are non-starters.
First, the cost of living increases every year. There are
millions of Americans who are collecting Social Security and living in poverty.
So go ahead our duly elected government and make it even harder for your old
and poor citizens to survive.
Oh while you are at it, stop lying. Social Security is not
broke, (just as the Post Office is not) repay the money you borrow from the SSA
for your wars and there will be plenty of money to pay the benefits. Furthermore,
remove the cap on SS payroll tax (there is no SS tax on income over $106,800)
and watch the dough roll in. The Waltons by themselves would cover the monthly
nut for a substantial number of retirees.
Why should the retirement age be raised again? There are
Americans toiling in coalmines and other back breaking unhealthy jobs, and you
are asking them to work even longer, while you continue to give tax breaks to
the rich.
Now I actually agree with one of his demands. I have no problem limiting Medicare benefits
to the rich, they can afford the best medical care money can buy, including
concierge physicians. Take that money and use it to lower the co-pays for those
struggling to survive and to help those citizens, who skip taking their
medications as directed, because they have to choose between paying rent,
buying food and taking their medications.
Nah! It's just too much fun to be mean.
ReplyDeleteThe political, economic, military, foreign policy and trade decisions made by this country's recently past leadership, going as far back as I can remember, have actually been "STUPID," just as Trump has stated. The public hasn't kept accounts, apparently. Either it's short memories or just poor judgement about their chosen leadership, I'm not sure which; but on that single premise, he speaks from a perspective that can hardly be challenged. Personally, I'm not so sure it's stupidity but rather, just plain and simply, our selfish determination that has guided this entire process. And that's our biggest problem today. We no longer have true statesmen or a selfless, determined, public-focused leadership running our country. We haven't for years. Instead, it's politics as usual, designed for billionaires to be...with their large libraries and closely held, self-centered legacies after leaving office, and with no accountability for their past records.
ReplyDelete