Hillary Rodham Clinton continues to lead in the polls, even
though Bernie Sanders is speaking to record crowds.
Over the weekend he attracted over 20,000 to a rally in
Boston, which was more than twice the number that turned out in 2008 to listen
to then Candidate Barack Obama.
I watched a clip last night of Clinton speaking at a “Town
Hall” on the Today show and thought, okay; there is the fiery Clinton I
remember from ’08. Welcome back.
Kevin McCarthy gave her a gift by developing diarrhea of the
mouth with his Benghazi remarks. He presented her with opportunity to come out
swinging and she has.
Not only on the hearings but also with a strong statement on
our deadlocked gun debate. She would push
for the repeal of the gun show loophole,
under which private gun sellers do not need to perform background checks on
buyers, push to revoke the licenses of dealers who make straw sales and, the
biggest part, push to repeal the NRA backed law that prevents crime victims
from suing gun manufacturers. That law alone tells us whom our elected Congress
represents. (The fact that the 3 day
waiting period is not set in stone also needs to be fixed.)
I have not been impressed me by her until the SNL
skit and then her performance on the Today show. I felt she was resting on her laurels (Dems
cannot afford laurel resting, there is too much at stake).
Based on the response to Senator Sanders, it would seem that
there is concern across the liberal electorate.
The big concern for her at this time is the huge dip her
numbers have taken in the polls among Black women.
Congress and the White House in the hands of the Republican
Party which is now run by the Tea Party would be a disaster, not only for us living
in America, but for the rest of the world.
There is a saying, when the US gets a cold the rest of the world gets pneumonia. Double pneumonia would be the result of that.
Carly Fiorina – I heard a reporter who covered her during
her run for the Senate say that she is a better candidate now that she was
then.
If that is so, she must have been awful. It seems she has a
never-ending list of ‘reallys?” Did she say/do that? And the answer keeps
coming up yes.
Candidates love to stiff their vendors if they lose, but
when they are back in the public eye and are asked about it, most show some
remorse. She does not. She exhibits a “whatever” attitude that is to me,
heartless.
And her ability to tell a lie (the Planned Parenthood fetus
video) and then stick with it, refusing to say, I exaggerated to make a point
or whatever excuse works for her, I find disheartening in a candidate for
President.
And of course, there is her record as CEO of Hewlett
Packard. Her story is not the truth, she ran that corporation into the ground.
Over 30,000 employees lost their jobs and the HP’s stock took a beating. All under her watch, but none of that is her
fault, and the stock rebounding after a very bad merger with Compaq is her
doing. HP fired her, she almost destroyed that company and now she wants the
chance to destroy America.
I, fortunately, can state
without any doubts, she will not get the chance.
Not the best basis for casting a ballot. But, while Fiorina was CEO of HP I had three pieces of HP equipment. All were dismal performers, poorly designed and prone to breakdown. Having her make me a bad laptop is one thing. Having her make me a bad national budget or a bad army is quite another.
ReplyDelete